Effect of laser peak power on LIDAR's ability to detect UAVs under changing atmospheric conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.107.2025.95-104Keywords:
LIDAR; UAV detection; Link Budget analysis; Atmospheric attenuation.Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive Link Budget analysis for optimizing laser peak power in a UAV detection LIDAR (light detection and ranging) system operating under variable atmospheric conditions. The analytical model combines Beer-Lambert atmospheric transmission law, Lambertian target scattering, and APD characteristics to establish relationships between power and range across four atmospheric scenarios (α ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 km-1). Validated through Monte Carlo simulations, our analysis demonstrates that maintaining Pd = 0.9 for 0.3×0.3 m UAV targets at 1000 m requires adaptive power control from 3.75 kW to 10.18 kW. This research provides quantitative parameters for designing intelligent LIDAR systems with adaptive power modulation capability responsive to atmospheric conditions. Consequently, the system reduces power consumption by 40-60% compared to legacy systems that must continuously operate at maximum peak power regardless of clear or foggy atmospheric states.
References
[1]. Richmond, R. D., & Cain, S. C. “Direct-Detection LADAR Systems”. SPIE Press, (2010).
[2]. Huntington, Andrew. “Sensitivity analysis of APD photoreceivers”. VoxtelOpto, Voxtel Inc., pp. 1–39, (2016).
[3]. Steinvall, O., & Chevalier, T. “Range accuracy and resolution for laser radars”. Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 5988, p. 598808, (2005).
[4]. Wang, Dong, et al. “Quantum-secured LIDAR with Gaussian modulated coherent states”. Scientific Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 22058, (2024).
[5]. Kapoulas, Ioannis K., et al. “Small fixed-wing UAV radar cross-section signature investigation and detection and classification of distance estimation using realistic parameters of a commercial anti-drone system”. Drones, Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 39, (2023).
[6]. Lee, S., Lee, D., Choi, P., & Park, D. “Accuracy-power controllable LiDAR sensor system with 3D object recognition for autonomous vehicle”. Sensors, Vol. 20, No. 19, p. 5706, (2020).
[7]. Kim, Byeong Hak, et al. “V-RBNN based small drone detection in augmented datasets for 3D LADAR system”. Sensors, Vol. 18, No. 11, p. 3825, (2018).
[8]. Yu, Ronghua, et al. “The Design and Performance Evaluation of a 1550 nm All-Fiber Dual-Polarization Coherent Doppler Lidar for Atmospheric Aerosol Measurements”. Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, No. 22, p. 5336, (2023).
[9]. Elamassie, Mohammed, & Uysal, Murat. “Unified atmospheric attenuation models for visible and infrared wavelengths”. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 2099–2111, (2024).
[10]. Quentel, Alain. “A scanning LiDAR for long range detection and tracking of UAVs”. Dissertation, Normandie Université, (2021).
[11]. Kim, Isaac I., Bruce McArthur, & Eric J. Korevaar. “Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications”. Optical Wireless Communications III, Vol. 4214, SPIE, (2001).
[12]. Guo, Junran, et al. “Long-Distance Field Demonstration of Imaging-Free Drone Identification in Intracity Environments”. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2504.20097, (2025).
